>You also began with the assertion that Monckton's statements have been widely debunked.
It was a misstatement. He should have said Monckton's statements have been refuted, completely, every time. I listed 17 cases, all refuted. If those aren't enough, here are a few more recent ones:
Monckton Misrepresents Scientists' Own Work (Part 1)
http://www.skepticalscience.com/monckton-misrepresents-scientists-own-work-part1.html Monckton Misrepresents Specific Situations (Part 2)
http://www.skepticalscience.com/monckton-misrepresents-specific-situations-part2.html Monckton Misrepresents Reality (Part 3)
http://www.skepticalscience.com/monckton-misrepresents-reality-part3.html A mishmash of Monckton misrepresentation
http://www.skepticalscience.com/mishmash-Monckton-misrepresentation.html It isn't surprising that you Heartland acolytes continue to spread the gospel according to Monckton, His is a completely faith-based system of thought.
