Just add modifiers to your dislike, like "extreme CV...."
btw, what did you think of Trading Babe's analysis of your post?
ClimatEnerGeopolitics msg # 6378 5/22/2012 4:31:11 AM
By: Trading Baby
Re: The "Why" behind the well Funded Athropogenic Global Warming Alarmism assault on science
>In other words, AGW alarmists must if necessary exaggerate and lie to be effective.
That's false. That is not what he said. You're cherry-picking his sentences too.
> it is very simple to write, "As a scientist, we must be ethical and honest." But he didn't write that.
use your reasoning on your own words. In your above statement, you are
saying that someone who is NOT a scientist (yourself) is not required to
be ethical and honest. By your reasoning, that is what you meant.
amstocks82 doesn't have to be ethical and honest, because he isn't a
scientist. And that is exactly what we see. You aren't behaving
ethically and honestly.
It is very simple to write, "Everyone
should always be ethical and honest." But you didn't write that. You
wrote to you audience of anti-science people in denial.