Re: Q's from the jury
Just a note, I am hearing that there is uncertainty as to what the jury was asking about. Were they asking about Past 1 & 2 all within question 1 or were they referring to question 2, boots ont he ground say it was hard to tell.
It makes more sense that they asked the judge about two parts of question #1 meaning they wantyed to know if they could seperate the 440 & 664 patants. If that is the case, then it would seem to mean that they have unanimous consensus on one patent infringing but not both, hence they asked the judge if they couls seperate the two parts of question #1.
Be very careful trying to understand what is going on boots ont he ground today, there is going to be strange infromation and accurate information coming out of VG until this is over.
My guess is we go to question #2 on one patent and not both for now unless they can get consensus on two. By the quesito they asked, it seems unlikely, JMO.