Ending taxpayer funding of union salaries
03/14/2012
PHOENIX
-- Sal DiCiccio says he’s sorry. It is, he says, no excuse that the
complex labor contracts that he, as a member of the city council, voted
to ratify for city employees were presented to the council less than a
week before the vote. He says he should have seen that the contracts
contain some indefensible, not to mention unconstitutional, provisions,
such as those pertaining to "release time."
Read on, and then find out if similar things are occurring in your community. They probably are.
The
"gift clause" in Arizona's Constitution and similar provisions in some
other states' constitutions are supposed to prevent the state government
or municipal governments from conferring special benefits on "any
individual, association, or corporation." The proscribed benefits
include gifts, loans of state credit, donations, grants or subsidies.
This
clause has been largely vitiated by Arizona courts' decisions allowing
entanglements of government and private interests that supposedly serve a
"public purpose" or provide a "public benefit." These are loopholes
large enough to drive a truck through -- a truck carrying $900,000. That
is the estimated value of the release time taxpayers are funding just
for the Phoenix Law Enforcement Association (PLEA), the police union.
The $900,000 pays union officials to work exclusively performing
undefined union business, including lobbying, on the city's time and the
taxpayers' dime.
Mark Flatten of the Goldwater Institute, a
conservative think tank, says all six of the top PLEA officers derive
full pay and benefits from the city, although each is assigned full time
to the union -- and each is also entitled to 160 hours of annual
extra-pay overtime. Officials of the six other public employees unions
also have full-time city jobs. All told, the annual bill for 73,000
hours of release time is $3.7 million.
In 2007, Phoenix
voters endorsed a sales tax increase to pay for more police and
firefighters. DiCiccio, who is working for better contracts, knows that
few voters knew about the existence, let alone the costs, of release
time.
Other states and local governments have release
time provisions in contracts with public employees, as do some federal
contracts. The unions, and their partners and enablers in government,
insist that release time activities improve government employees' morale
and efficiency and they receive the release time benefit in lieu of
higher wages and benefits. But how could that be demonstrated?
If
release time really involves no increase in aggregate compensation to
union members, why do unions favor this roundabout route to
compensation? One reason, perhaps, is to punish police officers who do
not join the union: They see some of their potential wages go instead to
union officials. Also, if union activities were paid for by union dues
rather than tax dollars, there would be less dues money available for
campaign contributions to the grateful politicians who negotiate release
time benefits for the contributing unions.
This is a
crucial difference between release time provisions negotiated by private
companies: In the private sector, unions are not effectively on both
sides of the negotiation table. Collusion between the employer and the
employees' union is inherent in public-sector unionization,
particularly because public-sector employers and employees have
congruent interests in increasing government budgets.
Release
time provisions have existed for 40 years. What is new is a willingness
to call attention to them and contest them, a willingness born of the
pressure the recession has put on municipal budgets. Just as a recession
has the benefit of making private enterprises more conscious of
efficiencies, it makes governments less cavalier about expenditures.
Until
now, Wisconsin has been ground zero in the spreading desire to
reconsider the costly prerogatives of public-sector unions. In January,
however, a series of bills were introduced in the Arizona Legislature to
end release time and even end collective bargaining.
Another
measure would end the practice of the state and local governments
collecting dues for the unions by deducting them from employees'
paychecks. Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels did this by executive order on his
first day in office seven years ago. Union dues collections then
declined 90 percent. And last month Indiana became the first Midwestern
industrial state to become a right-to-work state.
As a
percentage of the workforce, private-sector unionization peaked in 1954.
Now, thanks to events here and in Gov. Scott Walker's Wisconsin,
Indiana and elsewhere, and thanks to local officials like DiCiccio,
public-sector unionization, which began in the 1950s, may have passed
its apogee.