when occupy wall street was first put together, the exposure that was done revealed some major LIBERAL players were behind the effort.  Question was WHY....  what was the GAIN they sought to achieve...

 I called it the start of obamas CIVIL WAR...  pit one group against the other, pit the HAVE NOTS against the HAVES and use it to create DIVISION In the country.  Keep the WAR alive and use it to rally the election base...

 

the Occupy effort hasn't died.  The pieces are in place...  and on top of it, obama thru the use of EXECUTIVE ORDERS now appears to have given himself the power to 'react' in the 'event' SOMETHING just 'happens' to happen...  (not planned, in other words, the ones behind the potential exploding of this civil war have to make it look spontaneous so that they can't be blamed and can be seen as the heros...)

 

so now, the question is, why the sudden rise in articles like this?   Seeing that homeland security is reportedly 'concerned' and preparing for something to happen as another example...  what do they know??  Are these articles simply helping to incite the people, get their emotions charged up? 

 

we will see...   but I for one will not be surprised to see the LEFT create a situation designed to escalate the haves vs the have not battle.   For they can't win on ideas, nope, they need to make the have nots believe the haves are out to screw them, and that the have nots NEED to get their FAIR SHARE...

 

afterall, as I have said recently, study your 'enemy'...  know how they think.  The LIBS are desperate to hold onto the power they now have...  for they sense correctly, they have overplayed their hand and if they get beaten back now.  it might be a while before they get control of the country again... 

 

and as we have oft seen, getting between a liberal and their agenda brings out the 'best' in them....  for to them, the AGENDA is it...  and the tactics to achieve mean anything and everything is possible...   even if it could result in the attorney general of the US being held in contempt for blocking the potential exposure of an anti-gun run at the 2nd amendment and the death of a border agent in the process.  In this case for example, the death of a border agent is simply collateral damage, for you sure as hell don't see LIBERALS clamoring for an investigation into holder do we?  Nope, got to protect their own...    for it sure seems this may have been again, an effort to go after the 2nd amendment and that can not be exposed.  even if it means covering up the death of  a US border agent...