IDCC   /  Message Board  /  Read Message

 


 








dannoanderson
dndodd
econopunk
flute_man
Ghop
johndowd
LTL_KAHUNA
NicdaGreek
Options Backdater
r4r4
sluicer
Stock Curmudgeon
taxitall
Tfwg
ThinkandGrowRich
timmuggs
tivonomo
vpupo
wil3



My IDCC Ignore List


Keyword
Subject
Between
and
Rec'd By
Authored By
Minimum Recs
  
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board
Msg  62773 of 65405  at  6/27/2012 1:13:10 PM  by

postyle


 In response to msg 62770 by  dndodd
ignore topicview thread,  thread start

Re: Patent Values... are unknown

As I posted in msg# 62671, it makes no sense to do any type of comparable quantitative analysis of the patent sale to Intel with any other reported patent sales.
 
So if we are certain that the MMI and NT deals included the best of those company's patents, and we really don't know all that much about IDCC's patent sale other than that the company as classified them as "non-core" and "surplus" patents that will not affect licenses (current and future) or litigation proceedings....
 
Why in the world is anyone trying to do a quantitative comparison of these patents?
 
It makes no sense. We should already have a general idea that there is an apples vs oranges element at play when it comes to assessing the level of quality of these patents... let's not make it worse by applying some useless math.
 
I believe the same logic applies whether it is someone saying the price per patent is too low -- or --  the price per patent was abnormally high.  The knife cuts both ways.
 
Because IDCC has decided to provide very limited details on the sold assets, I can understand why Bill might want to throw out a Q&D example to silence the naysayers. Nevertheless, it's nothing more than an example and offers little insight into the true value of what has been sold.
 
The facts as I see them:
 
* IDCC has been publicly promoting the idea of selling non-core assets since the start of the year.
 
* According to a 1/31/2012 report from "The Deal Pipeline",  IDCC was looking to sell patents that were not providing any significant value to licensing.
 
* Several reports and publications identified infrastructure and 802.xx patents as the non-core assets that were being shopped around to various purchasers.
 
* IDCC is looking to accomplish more with their patent sales than just to receive money for non-performing assets:
      + They are trying to motivate licensees (existing and potential) to come to terms sooner rather than later.
       + They are trying to create a valuation catalyst for a stock that has come crashing back to earth from its highs the previous year. 
       + They are trying to potentially swap out surplus patents with patent acquisitions that might add diversity to their existing portfolio (add value to the licensing program).


 
     e-mail to a friend      printer-friendly     add to library      
| More
Recs: 18  |  Views: 529
Previous Message  Next Message   Post Message   Post a Reply return to message boardtop of board


About Us  •  Contact Us  •  Follow Us on Twitter  •  Members Directory  •  Help  •  Advertise
Not a member yet? What are you waiting for? Join Now
Want to contribute? Support InvestorVillage by donating
© 2003-2013 Investorvillage.com. All rights reserved. User Agreement
   
Financial Market Data provided by
.


Loading...